Blowup Ukrainegate and You End the Next War

Donald Trump was in Israel and Egypt Sunday and Monday, securing a historic Middle East Peace. On his way out the door, he posted this on Truth Social:

Why is the President posting this now? 

Pressed in a gaggle on Air Force 1 about Ukraine’s demand for Tomahawk missiles, President Trump said he would want to talk to Putin before making a decision.  This stunned the reporter asking the question.  Trump said this would be an aggressive escalation. He said he might tell Putin that if he did not take further steps toward peace, he would provide Ukraine with Tomahawks.

Ukraine and the sick Europeans have been begging Trump to provide the Tomahawks for strikes deep inside Russia for months now. According to their press, this is almost a done deal.

Before my fellow antiwar friends start clutching pearls, they should think about Trump’s response to the question detailed above. It’s familiar Trump negotiating tactic 101.  Then they should ask themselves the question I just asked. 

Why is Trump talking about his first impeachment now?

As of this post, Russia is pounding Ukraine’s energy infrastructure ahead of winter and Ukraine’s front lines are collapsing. A full exposure of the actors in Russiagate and the first impeachment –pretty much the same people–has the potential to evaporate any remaining support for continuing the war in the United States. These are disgusting and evil people.  I think President Trump wants you to get to know them so that their insanity can be noted and contained. 

Russiagate and Ukrainegate Have the Same Cast 

When Trump first walked down the escalator in 2015 and announced his candidacy for President, British and NATO spies were already spying on him.

Just look at the headline in the Guardian from 2017.

This set off the Russiagate hoax in which Ukrainian intelligence operatives played key roles. 

Alexandra Chalupa was the DNC’s main contact with the 22 million vote strong Ukrainian diaspora in the United States.  She started digging up dirt to smear Trump as a Russian asset in 2015.  At the same time GCHQ and MI6 had initiated their actions against Trump.  According to Politico, Chalupa was working directly against Trump with the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington. 

Dmitri Alperovitch, over at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Research Lab ran groups of Ukrainian hackers and cyber warriors during the 2014 Ukraine coup.  It was Alperovitch’s Crowdstrike cyber security company that claimed the Russians were behind the hacking of the DNC and John Podesta and the publication of Hillary Clinton’s crimes by WikiLeaks.  In classified testimony in 2017, Crowdstrike’s representative admitted that this claim was bogus.  But that finding wasn’t declassified until 2020.

Ukrainian intelligence fabricated a fake “black ledger” of 12.7 million in cash payments to Paul Manafort’s consulting company.  When Chalupa and the Ukrainian Embassy circulated it to the media and the FBI, Manafort was chairing President Trump’s 2016 campaign.  He resigned and was subsequently convicted of unrelated tax crimes by Special Counsel Robert Mueller after he refused to flip on Trump. 

Christopher Steele, who wrote the dirty Russiagate dossier on Trump, was previously assigned to assisting the 2014 Ukraine coup for British intelligence.  He also wrote memos directly to Victoria Nuland at the U.S. State Department about both Ukraine and Donald Trump. 

So, turn over the rock called Russiagate and you’ll find Ukrainian and British intelligence.  You’ll also find their chief congressional allies in this hoax,  Adam Schiff in the House and Mark Warner in the Senate. The Russiagate operation crashed and burned in July of 2019 when Special Counsel Robert Mueller was forced to admit that there never was any collusion between Donald Trump and Russia.  Adam Schiff still maintains that Trump is Putin’s agent. 

Having committed many crimes in their first Russiagate onslaught against Trump, the conspirators immediately launched the next stage of their coup, the impeachment of Trump. The coverup of their crimes in Russiagate required continuing the coup against Trump and coming out on top.

The Zelensky Phone Call

The next stage of the coup was based on a phone call Trump had with Voldymyr Zelensky in July of 2019.  In that call, Trump asked Zelensky what he knew about Ukraine’s illegal 2016 operations against his campaign.  He also asked him whether a Ukrainian oligarch had the DNC server examined by Crowdstrike. He followed that up by asking about the firing of the corruption prosecutor in Ukraine and about Joe Biden bragging that he had stopped a corruption investigation of Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company where Hunter Biden sat on the board. He told Zelensky that he should tell Attorney General Barr what he knew about these things. 

The conversation occurred when Trump was withholding funding of Ukraine because of its notorious corruption.  Zelensky’s main political sponsor, for example, the oligarch, Ihor Kolomoisky, was personally involved in the disappearance of over $1 billion in U.S. funds designated to boost Ukraine’s economy.  After the call, Trump released the withheld funds. 

The Fake Whistleblower

That’s when Adam Schiff went to work in an intricate and very criminal setup.  First, a White House whistleblower came forward and claimed that the President was pressuring Zelensky to investigate the Bidens and rig the 2020 elections.  The whistleblower claimed that Trump was withholding funding to secure this result.   The whistleblower personally reached out to Schiff’s staff at the House intelligence committee and to the newly minted Inspector General of the intelligence community, Michael Atkinson.

Although Schiff’s staff helped the whistleblower draft his complaint, Schiff claimed neither he or his staff had any contact with him. Atkinson was a former political crimes prosecutor at the Justice Department and had most recently served in the same DOJ National Security Division which manufactured Russiagate.  He certified the whistleblower’s complaint as “urgent.”

The identity of the whistleblower was made a state secret.  Many social media sleuths correctly identified the whistleblower as Eric Ciaramella, a CIA Ukraine man detailed to the White House.  But in the farcical impeachment hearings and long after, even mentioning his name in coverage got you a social media ban across all platforms. 

And Ciaramella had a gigantic conflict.  Joe Biden famously ordered the firing of Ukraine prosecutor Victor Shokin.  Shokin was investigating Burisma, the Ukrainian gas firm where Hunter Biden sat on the Board, making $3 million for the Biden family enterprise. The money was for the use of the Biden name and stopping further investigations of the very dirty gas company.

Here’s the clip of Biden at the Council on Foreign Relations bragging about firing Shokin.

Ciaramella was Biden’s Ukraine assistant at the time and knew all about Hunter Biden’s corruption and Joe Biden’s corrupt firing of Shokin –the very things Trump was asking about in the July phone call. 

Not only that, Victoria Nuland describes Ciaramella as her point person at the Obama White House. 

As with most incidents in this coup, Schiff and others made a habit of accusing Trump of the very things they are guilty of.  Adam Schiff and crew successfully covered up Joe Biden’s Ukraine corruption through Trump’s first impeachment proceedings.  That coverup was a big part of rigging the 2020 election, along with the suppression of the Hunter Biden laptop story. 

Protection by the State Department and the CIA

One critical aspect of this Ukraine/Biden story never gets the coverage it deserves.  Ever since 2014, the United States, in conjunction with MI6, have sought to cut Russia’s oil and gas trade with Europe.  That’s when Joe Biden publicly outlined the plan in a speech before his beloved Atlantic Council.  The Atlantic Council is British intelligence’s most prominent Washington think tank. 

The plan was to end Ukraine’s gas imports and the transit lines through Ukraine of Russian gas for Europe.  That’s why the CIA’s Cofer Black was also on the Burisma Board.  Ukraine was to be opened up to exploitation by Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron, and others.

There was, however, one big problem in the scheme.  Most of Ukraine’s oil and gas lies in the Donbass and other eastern regions, which are the contested center of the current Ukraine war.  Burisma held many of the licenses for exploration in this region.

In 2014, Joe Biden showed up in Ukraine with a full package from US AID to assist Burisma fracking operations in east Ukraine.  That package was complemented by military operations intended to ethnically cleanse and subjugate the rebellious Russian speaking population of eastern Ukraine.  The Atlantic Council also was in on the action, doing public relations for the scheme. Burisma funded the Council to the tune of $240,000 per year. 

The Banderist Wing of the Ukrainian Diaspora

The Ukrainian Congress Committee of America is the most important organization within the huge Ukrainian diaspora, a 21 million person voting bloc.  And that organization honors and worships the Ukrainian Nazi collaborator Stepan Bandera.  After slaughtering Poles and Jews on behalf of Ukrainian nationalism and Hitler during World War II, Bandera was picked up  by British intelligence.  He was tasked with conducting  guerilla war insurgencies against the Soviet Union.  The numerous neo-Nazi groups in Ukraine now fighting Russia have Bandera as their hero.  

The UCCA has significant influence in Congress through the Ukraine caucuses in both the House and the Senate.  Many believe that these caucuses are far more powerful than AIPAC or other religious or ethnic caucuses.  You can get a sense of the size here: https://ukrainecaucus-kaptur.house.gov/   Many of these Senators and Representatives are just as crazed as the Europeans when it comes to ending the war in Ukraine.  They are fighting Donald Trump’s quest for peace at every step he takes to end this war.