CO2 Cult Collapsing Under New Scientific Era

The climate apocalypse cult, with its CO2 demonization and economic strangulation, is collapsing under a scientific and legal counteroffensive. Three landmark documents—the EPA’s bold rule reversal, the DOE’s rigorous climate review, and the Interior Department’s energy overhaul—unleash a new green revolution rooted in reason, not fear.

EPA’s Endangerment Rollback

The EPA’s proposed rule to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding, which falsely branded CO2 a public health threat, obliterates over $1 trillion in regulatory shackles. “CAA section 202(a) does not authorize the EPA to prescribe emission standards to address global climate change concerns,” the agency declares, wielding Loper Bright and West Virginia v. EPA to dismantle the administrative state’s overreach. Anchored by the Supreme Court’s rejection of Chevron deference, this rollback liberates automakers and consumers from crippling emissions mandates, championing innovation and affordability over climate dogma.

Dept. of Energy’s Scientific Rebuttal of Apocalypse Now

The DOE’s Critical Review by Sec. Wright, penned by five eminent scientists—John Christy (UAH climatologist, NASA medalist), Judith Curry (climate dynamics expert, Georgia Tech), Steven Koonin (physicist, former DOE undersecretary), Ross McKitrick (economist, climate statistician), and Roy Spencer (meteorologist, NASA awardee)—demolishes alarmist myths with rigorous data.

It asserts: “Claims of CO2-driven increases in hurricanes, tornadoes, or floods are unsupported by U.S. data, exposing the exaggeration of climate alarmism.” (p. 89)
On solar influences, it notes: “Solar variability… may account for up to 30% of modern warming, yet IPCC models marginalize these effects to uphold CO2-centric alarmism.” (p. 72)
CO2’s benefits are clear: “Carbon dioxide has driven a 15% increase in global vegetation since 1980, enhancing agricultural productivity.” (p. 42)
On Climate Models: “IPCC projections overestimate CO2’s warming effect by up to 40%, relying on unverified assumptions rather than empirical evidence.” (p. 67)
The report concludes: “U.S. emissions reductions have an undetectably small effect on global climate,” urging nuclear and high-output technologies over restrictive policies. (p. 123)

This evidence-based assault exposes the cult’s flawed models and political agenda, advocating instead for prosperity-driven environmentalism.

Capacity Density Revolution

The Interior Department’s order redefines energy policy by prioritizing capacity density—energy output per unit area—over sprawling, inefficient wind and solar projects.

It states: “A 1,000 MW nuclear plant occupies approximately 1 square mile, while a 1,000 MW wind project requires 60-80 square miles,” underscoring nuclear’s superior efficiency.

This mirrors Lyndon LaRouche’s energy flux density (EFD), which measures energy throughput to maximize economic and technological progress. Like EFD, capacity density champions high-intensity sources (nuclear, hydro) that deliver reliable power without devouring land.

The DOI warns, “Massive, unreliable energy projects… are inefficient uses of federal lands,” aligning with LaRouche’s vision of science-driven development over anti-growth environmentalism. This shift bolsters the DOE’s nuclear advocacy and the EPA’s pro-growth deregulations, forging a policy of shared economic success via production.

A chart comparing fuel types from the standpoint of LaRouche’s EFD:

Three Pillars of Reason

These three pillars are a scientific coup, and bury the climate cult’s fearmongering with data, legal clarity, and real economic metrics. By debunking CO2 myths, embracing solar and cosmic science, and adopting capacity density akin to LaRouche’s EFD, America’s new green revolution prioritizes reason and prosperity over self-destruction and fear.

The time for apocalyptic lies is over—it’s time to build a future of boundless potential.