Saturday Class - Why the Globalists Fear the Power of Classical Music - January 31, 2026
Explore the impact of classical music on society in Promethean Action's Weekly class for January 31st, 2026. Featuring
A scientific and legal counteroffensive is dismantling the climate apocalypse cult. Landmark EPA, DOE, and Interior Department actions unleash a new green revolution rooted in reason, debunking CO2 myths and championing high-intensity energy for a future of boundless potential.
The climate apocalypse cult, with its CO2 demonization and economic strangulation, is collapsing under a scientific and legal counteroffensive. Three landmark documents—the EPA’s bold rule reversal, the DOE’s rigorous climate review, and the Interior Department’s energy overhaul—unleash a new green revolution rooted in reason, not fear.
The EPA’s proposed rule to rescind the 2009 Endangerment Finding, which falsely branded CO2 a public health threat, obliterates over $1 trillion in regulatory shackles. “CAA section 202(a) does not authorize the EPA to prescribe emission standards to address global climate change concerns,” the agency declares, wielding Loper Bright and West Virginia v. EPA to dismantle the administrative state’s overreach. Anchored by the Supreme Court’s rejection of Chevron deference, this rollback liberates automakers and consumers from crippling emissions mandates, championing innovation and affordability over climate dogma.
The DOE’s Critical Review by Sec. Wright, penned by five eminent scientists—John Christy (UAH climatologist, NASA medalist), Judith Curry (climate dynamics expert, Georgia Tech), Steven Koonin (physicist, former DOE undersecretary), Ross McKitrick (economist, climate statistician), and Roy Spencer (meteorologist, NASA awardee)—demolishes alarmist myths with rigorous data.
This evidence-based assault exposes the cult’s flawed models and political agenda, advocating instead for prosperity-driven environmentalism.

The Interior Department’s order redefines energy policy by prioritizing capacity density—energy output per unit area—over sprawling, inefficient wind and solar projects.
It states: “A 1,000 MW nuclear plant occupies approximately 1 square mile, while a 1,000 MW wind project requires 60-80 square miles,” underscoring nuclear’s superior efficiency.
This mirrors Lyndon LaRouche’s energy flux density (EFD), which measures energy throughput to maximize economic and technological progress. Like EFD, capacity density champions high-intensity sources (nuclear, hydro) that deliver reliable power without devouring land.
The DOI warns, “Massive, unreliable energy projects… are inefficient uses of federal lands,” aligning with LaRouche’s vision of science-driven development over anti-growth environmentalism. This shift bolsters the DOE’s nuclear advocacy and the EPA’s pro-growth deregulations, forging a policy of shared economic success via production.
A chart comparing fuel types from the standpoint of LaRouche’s EFD:

These three pillars are a scientific coup, and bury the climate cult’s fearmongering with data, legal clarity, and real economic metrics. By debunking CO2 myths, embracing solar and cosmic science, and adopting capacity density akin to LaRouche’s EFD, America’s new green revolution prioritizes reason and prosperity over self-destruction and fear.
The time for apocalyptic lies is over—it’s time to build a future of boundless potential.
Get our free newsletter. Zero Spam.