Rare Kremlin video: Putin with Witkoff and Kushner, then their first Kyiv trip this term and Zelenskyy's restrained reply. Moscow cites trust and economic projects; Bessent chokes offshore funding. Argentina presses Malvinas as Trump rethinks automatic U.S. backing of Britain.
Harvard’s battle against the American System spans centuries. Mike examines globalization, America’s skilled-worker crisis, and what President Trump is building to replace it.
The offshore empire gets named on live TV, Wall Street's forecasters get humiliated by the jobs numbers, and Europe moves to loot its own savers. One pattern runs through all of it — and eight weeks to settle it. Five posts inside.
Saturday Class - The Science Underlying the American System of Physical Economy - August 29, 2026
Cable news is arguing eggs, beef, gas, and Iran. Bruce Director spent Saturday night on the real midterm question: American System vs. British System — two flavors of the same entropy, and nine weeks to pick a future.
BUT, the ballot question is American System vs. British System.
Bruce Director on why creativity — not statistics, not central planning — is the only source of wealth, and why nine weeks from now the country picks it's future.
Watch the full class on YouTube
In this week’s Saturday Class, Bruce Director went underneath the price-of-groceries argument to the fight that actually decides the November 3 midterms. Trump, Scott Bessent, Jamieson Greer, and Peter Navarro all say they are reviving the American System.
Stanley Druckenmiller’s attack on Bessent earlier this week is the other side saying the quiet part out loud: leave it to the magic of the marketplace. Bruce’s job Saturday night was to show what the two systems actually are — down to the physics.
Hamilton’s three reports — and one sentence that settles it
The American System was founded in practice by Alexander Hamilton’s reports to Congress: Public Credit, the National Bank, and the Report on Manufactures. Against Jefferson and Madison’s agricultural nation, Hamilton argued that manufacturing multiplies the productive powers of labor — division of labor, machinery, and this:
To cherish and stimulate the activity of the human mind by multiplying the objects of enterprise is not among the least considerable of the expedients by which the wealth of any nation may be promoted.
— Alexander Hamilton, Report on Manufactures, quoted by Bruce
Wealth comes from the improvement of the human mind. That principle ran from Hamilton through John Quincy Adams, Lincoln and Henry Carey, Friedrich List, McKinley, and FDR — and Lyndon LaRouche made it rigorous as a science of physical economy. Bruce, who worked with LaRouche for decades, presented these as his own views, developed out of that collaboration.
An economy’s input is creative ideas, and its output is more advanced creative ideas.
— Bruce Director
Two flavors of the British System — one bakery
The opposition comes in two flavors that cable news sells as opposites. Free trade — Adam Smith’s invisible hand, Mandeville’s private-vice-public-virtue beehive, gussied up and mathematized by Hayek, von Mises, and Friedman — is statistical mechanics applied to people: molecules bouncing in a gas, and Planck showed where statistics ends. Nothing is more probable than maximum entropy. Booms and busts, forever.
Socialism — Marx in its hard form, Keynes in its light form — is Newtonian determinism: the economy as a clockwork you can calculate forward and backward, five-year plans as differential equations. Marx, who did all his research inside the British system and explicitly attacked Henry Carey, got the role of technology exactly backwards. (Barbara Boyd is working on a pamphlet on Marx and the British system.)
Both flavors delete the same thing: the creative discovery that reorganizes everything. Both bake in entropy — the cream dispersing through the coffee, the system running down to equilibrium. Both have failed everywhere they were tried.
Nine weeks, and a speech in Houston
Creativity is voluntary. It cannot be compelled — which is why compelled societies don’t have it, and why America does. The American System has 250 years of experimental proof; the empires that ran the other system are relics. Trump’s Friday speech at the Johnson Space Center points where the American System is headed for years to come — if the midterms deliver a Congress that will implement it.
The real debate isn’t the price of eggs. It’s whether the universe is a clock running down or a creation still creating — and which Congress we elect on November 3 depends on which answer wins.
Watch the full class — then send it to the person in your life who thinks “capitalism vs. socialism” is the only menu.
—Promethean Action Editorial Staff
PS: If this class grabbed you, come live next Saturday. Sign up here and we’ll send you the class details every week.
Philosopher and expert in anti-entropic science (dynatropy), Cusa and Leibniz. 50 year collaborator of Lyndon LaRouche. Author of “Riemann for Anti-Dummies.” Classical double bass player.
Founding member of the LaRouche movement in the 1960s. Former editor of LaRouche’s writings and EIR magazine. Regular host of our Saturday class series.
Chatbots dominate the AI argument. Brian Lantz spent Saturday night on the other kind — robots, machine shops, and factory floors — and why manufacturing, not the data center, is where the country actually gets richer.
Nixon called it “temporary.” 55 years later it’s still policy. Will Wertz reads the paper trail — the secret Kissinger memo, the Volcker Group, Britain’s run on Fort Knox — and the principles of the new Bretton Woods Trump’s Treasury says is underway.
In 1775, Americans and Quebec militiamen fought as brothers to free Canada from the British crown. Bob Ingraham on the lie of the "invasion," Franklin's near-miss at the peace table — and why, 250 years later, the question is open again.
Four new nuclear reactors went critical in a single month — America's first in 40 years. Brian Lantz on the factory boom the media won't name, and the apprenticeship programs that pay you to help build it. The hardest problem was never the physics.