Russia’s 300,000 tons of diesel and Rubio’s sanctions on the International Criminal Court hit the same target: the globalist apparatus George Soros built. Susan Kokinda follows the fight from Navi Pillay’s Nobel to Rubio in Athens and a Columbus Day proclamation quoting Pope Leo XIII.
From steel mills to shipyards to spaceports, Mike Steger explores Trump’s “Freedom’s Forge 2.0”—a vision to rebuild American industry, revive the West, and relight the torch of progress.
Trump broke ground on the biggest new American shipyard since WWII, on the old Bethlehem Steel site. A day later, Rubio told the West to reindustrialize or accept decline. With 25 days to go, here's why the midterms will be won on the economy, and why you have to vote on the future.
Left: Alameda Point zoning map showing the Enterprise District. Right: A close-up view of the Pacific Fusion project area. Image presented at the February 18, 2025 City Council meeting, Agenda #7-B, Presentation.
The City Council of Alameda, California has approved an Exclusive Negotiating Agreement with the company Pacific Fusion to pursue a plan to develop a site for a nuclear fusion test project in the near term. The support from the City Council and the public for the move on February 18th was enthusiastic. Despite the presence of the Lawrence Livermore National Lab in the county, Alameda’s energy approaches have previously only featured plans to advance solar power, carbon capture, and similar insufficient modes of power technology.
Pacific Fusion joins more than 40 other companies nationally developing concrete plans for near term fusion energy production and power plants, a nuclear power renaissance fully backed by President Donald Trump. According to Nuclear Newswire, its development team includes veterans from Lawrence Livermore’s successful inertial confinement experiments.
Pacific’s approach, however, is somewhat unique. It uses an inertial fusion geometry, compressing the fusion fuel with pulsed implosions, rather than a sustained magnetic field. The particular design is called magnetic liner fusion or fast liner fusion. Unlike many inertial fusion designs, MagLIF does not use lasers, but extremely intense pulses of electricity to magnetically compress the fuel which is contained within a small metal tube or liner. The design approach is modular and mobile, creating the basis for multiple applications, including in manufacturing.
Pacific Fusion plans to demonstrate “net facility gain”, producing more energy from a fusion blast than the stored energy producing the blast, by the end of the decade. Then they would move to building a demonstration plant for electric power production, within five years.
Magnetic liner fusion has an interesting history going back to the 1970’s. This technology has consistently been worked on by the nation’s Sandia Lab in Albuquerque. Early on, there was a potential for U.S-Soviet collaboration on this technology. The Soviets had a much more developed program, but the U.S. had a huge capacitor bank, thanks to the shutdown of another program at Sandia. The U.S. scientists were all in favor of going ahead with collaboration and so were the leaders of the U.S. intelligence community, but apparently someone at the top of the DOE kiboshed the deal.
Not only that, but under British pressure, the entire U.S. MagLIF program was put under classification wraps. This stifled the program for many years.
Fortunately MagLIF was kept alive at Sandia. Pacific is banking on a pulser using impedance-matched Marx generator (IMG) technology (invented in 2017 and “demonstrated in action at Lawrence Livermore in 2022”) to deliver an intense, 100-nanosecond burst of energy by accounting for electromagnetic-wave propagation and “stacking waves,” as opposed to the “stacking voltage” approach of conventional pulser technology. With IMG, internally reflected waves cancel, leaving only forward-going waves, according to a technical paper produced by Pacific Fusion concerning its approach.
You can see how this innovative approach works by going to Pacific Fusion’s website.
Why “super” and not “artificial”? Brian Lantz shows SI at work in an Arizona copper mine, aimed at a nuclear-powered Moon, and in service of new forms of human creativity. Watch the full class.
Bruce Director digs into your comments from the Aug 29 class: why the British System is inherently entropic, why no equation can predict a creative discovery, and how frontier science backs the American System’s idea of man.
Cable news is arguing eggs, beef, gas, and Iran. Bruce Director spent Saturday night on the real midterm question: American System vs. British System — two flavors of the same entropy, and nine weeks to pick a future.
Chatbots dominate the AI argument. Brian Lantz spent Saturday night on the other kind — robots, machine shops, and factory floors — and why manufacturing, not the data center, is where the country actually gets richer.